Hey, just to let you know I removed the 'reason' as to why harsh swears aren’t allowed because it was actually made not allowed due to some people finding swears offensive.
I would have changed it rather than removed it, but source mode was extremely laggy due to all the coding and the length of it, but you can add it if you want. (the actual reason)
And I returned it to its original state of censored swears not being allowed because people still find them offensive censored or not. Moreover more harsher swears could (again could idk) make people see the wiki as unwelcoming or somethin'.
Since Yumms announced on AJW that he would be going inactive and maybe not even coming back, like a month or two ago, and has shown that to be true, should we temporarily demote him until he decides he has come back? Or uh, it looks like he came back?
Unless he already got demoted and I just need to reload his page and since the CSS is not working and stuff
Petaya the Ring Tailed Lemur wrote:
And plus, with the reaction of “your sister”, it looked a lot like “they” were trying to clean up “their” mistake.
Ok. -goes home- AHH YES MY SIS IS NOT A TROLL ANYMORE OMG YUSSSSSS
That’s not a joke, it’s me pointing out evidence that your sister is your sockpuppet.
I'm not a sockpuppet. End of story. It's ok if you think my sister is a sockpuppet.
Any proof that you’re not sockpuppeting as her?
Making a new account and pretending it’s not you is against this wiki’s rules.
I checked the contributions of “your sister” and it shows:
12:24, June 16, 2018 (diff | hist) . . (+20) . . N Talk:Iloveredpanda123/@comment-34123211-20180614015047/@comment-35586397-20180616122405 (Created page with "aww ty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!") (top)
Your sister’s first comment was posted on June 16, 2018 at 12:24, saying thank you which looked like you had forgotten to log out of your sock, because that comment was directed at you (Iloveredpanda123), but “your sister” (Fuzzyfoxgirl) had responded to it as if it was directed at her.
Afterwards, rather than saying “oops I forgot to log out of my sister’s account because we used the same device”, or the like, “your sister” said “OMG WAT YOU SHOULD SAY THAT TO MEH IM HER SISTER OMG SHE IS SO FAILURE I AM SOOOOOOOO SMART”. It was posted on June 16, 2018 at 12:24. Clearly “your sister” was trying to clean up her mistake, since it’s not like that was posted 30 minutes later.
Exactly what her contributions said:
12:24, June 16, 2018 (diff | hist) . . (+100) . . N Talk:Iloveredpanda123/@comment-34123211-20180614015047/@comment-35586397-20180616122456 (Created page with "OMG WAT YOU SHOULD SAY THAT TO MEH IM HER SISTER OMG SHE IS SO FAILURE I AM SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO SMART")
You can see for proof here (of both what time it was posted and what she said): 
EDIT: Copied and pasted time wrong, fixing italics
I think Petaya just proved right there that your sister might be a possible sockpuppet of yours. You may challenge her statements if you wish, but any misbehavior, harassment or trolling will lead to a short block.
Iloveredpanda123 wrote: I'm not saying its ok to make a sockpuppet. I'm saying you can think my sister is my sockpuppet.
If ‘I can think your sister is your sockpuppet’ then I can technically ban you for sockpuppeting, and making your sockpuppet troll. (I’m not saying I’m going to)
If you disproved my points or showed proof of your sister not being a sockpuppet then I cannot ban you for sockpuppeting.
If you admitted or whatever to your sister being a sockpuppet, the end result may end up with you being banned, but probably for less time than it would end up if it’s decided that your sister is definitely a sockpuppet and it definitely does look this way.
I might add that ‘your sister’ has once nominated you for Failure of The Month, and it looks a lot like she is your sockpuppet, and during the vote where she nominated you it clearly stated “You cannot vote for yourself.”